Protecting Witch Doctors

Health & Medical

Protecting Witch Doctors

Is the Federal Government going to pursue activists who expose the lies about the sickening ‘gender affirmation surgery’ and chemical castrations performed at many US children’s hospitals?

It is a crime to threaten to harm children at Boston Children’s Hospital and other hospitals by threatening to hurt them. Threats and physical violence are unacceptable. These are unacceptable. If those who make physical threats against hospital staff are the Department of Justice, then fine.

Here’s what the US Attorney in Massachusetts said yesterday:

“Today’s news about the alleged threats directed at Boston Children’s Hospital transgender health program is disturbing to say the least. Children should have the chance to be themselves and thrive. Children deserve to be supported by their parents/guardians, and other health care professionals without harassment or threats. The Department of Justice will provide equal legal protection for transgender individuals. Merrick Garland, Attorney General, recently stated that “We at the Justice Department view confronting hatred crimes as both legal and moral obligation.” My administration has made it a priority to confront hate crimes, and established a unit for the investigation and prosecution civil rights violations. Our efforts have been tireless in communicating to hate groups the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s openness for business. Our newly established hotline, 1-83-END-H8-NOW has resulted in dozens of calls and we will continue to pursue all leads. Fear, intimidation, and threats, while free speech may be the foundation of this great nation’s existence, aren’t they? I will not sit idly by and allow hate-based criminal activity to continue in our District.”

It is not my intention to make you feel guilty if I bring down the law against you.

See also  Republicans Formally Investigating Biden Admin for Selling Strategic Reserve Oil to China

In reality, we deal with an institution (the DOJ), which is controlled by the ideological right, which believes words are like weapon, as was taught to us by Cher ,. We have every reason for concern that the State will pursue people who speak truths that it considers ideologically objectionable. Is this what they are referring to when they say “hate crime”? Does this mean the US government will use its power to silence anyone who speaks out against the horrible treatment Boston Children’s and other hospitals in the US do to minors and children?

What is happening here? When activists such as Chris Rufo and Matt Walsh point out the activities of hospitals, often using promotional materials or documents created by them, hospitals and their defenders become a maniac. These progressive institutions are not only eager to propagate these evil practices but also lose their minds when the ordinary citizens see them.

If you refer to it as “gender affirmation surgical”, you are in good company. You are considered a criminal if you refer to it as sexually mutilating minors. Look:

You should know that these hospitals and their allies in the media (see here) often lie about what they do to keep the public from being alarmed about these grotesque, Mengele-esque abuses:

You know this isn’t true. It’s possible to make your point without lying. 2017 journal article: “…despite the minimum age of 18 years defining eligibility …vaginoplasties are being performed on minors by surgeons in the United States contravening the WPATH standards of care (SOC).” https://t.co/Pd7kEDDS8B pic.twitter.com/dw2kvkliT6

— 4thWaveNow (@4th_WaveNow) August 19, 2022

The co-founder of the youth gender clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital admitted to giving cross-sex hormones to a 13 year old child.

Dr. Norman Spack has suggested girls be given ‘gender affirming’ mastectomies as young as 14.

READ FULL: https://t.co/sWSFbV0P0W pic.twitter.com/9YbdaFFbYL

— REDUXX (@ReduxxMag) August 18, 2022

Readers: You need to realize that all this is going on around you, that media and governmental agencies don’t want to tell you about it, and that you can draw conclusions if you are ideologically right.

Did you know that some states grant minors the right of sexual reassignment without parents consent? Abigail Shrier wrote last summer about it. Excerpt:

Taken individually, no single law in any state completely strips parents’ rights over the care and mental health treatment of their troubled minor teens. But pieced together, laws in California, Oregon, and Washington place troubled minor teens as young as 13 in the driver’s seat when it comes to their own mental health care–including “gender affirming” care–and renders parents powerless to stop them.

Here, for instance, are the powers granted to a 13-year-old child by the state of Washington. Minors age 13 and up are entitled to admit themselves for inpatient and outpatient mental health treatment without parental consent. Health insurers are forbidden from disclosing to the insured parents’ sensitive medical information of minor children–such as that regarding “gender dysphoria [and] gender affirming care.” Minors aged 13 to 18 can withhold mental health records from parents for “sensitive” conditions, which include both “gender dysphoria” and “gender-affirming care.” Insurers in Washington must cover a wide array of “gender-affirming treatments” from tracheal shaves to double mastectomies. A seventh-grader could have the right to “gender affirming” care. This may be anything, from the provider using her name and pronouns, to the child preparing for hormone therapy.

Lest you wonder whether there is some madcap elixir polluting the groundwater of Washington State alone, in 2015, Oregon passed a law permitting minors 15 and older to obtain puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries at taxpayers’ expense–all without parental consent. In 2018, California passed a similar bill for all children in foster care, age 12 and up. The California state senate is now considering an amendment to the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act that would bar health insurers from disclosing medical information to parents about their dependents, on pain of criminal liability.

Did you know this? Most likely not. Our media are ideologically captured as well and view their part in the controversy as managing The Narrative. Immersive surveillance of schools and teachers is increasing. These policies are designed to colonize children’s minds with gender ideology and keep parents ignorant.

When I was researching Live Not By Lies, I discovered that it was common practice in Communist regimes for the State to regard parents as the enemy, and to interpose itself between them and their children. It was something I couldn’t have imagined as I wrote that book. The State would persuade children to permanently mutilate their bodies with chemicals or surgery and get away with it.

Can you still trust your family doctor or hospital staff? Really?

Yale Pediatric Gender Program director says she treats kids as young as THREE on their “gender journey” including medical intervention
pic.twitter.com/WoCrr9Utnb

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 18, 2022

Professor at Children’s Mercy Hospital says not giving a child puberty blockers is a form of psychological abuse and suggests parents should be held criminally liable and the state should intervene. pic.twitter.com/VsvTFlIkJj

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 18, 2022

Minnesota family physician says we need to give trans children puberty blockers, HRT, and transition surgeries. She also encourages teens to seek healthcare without parents pic.twitter.com/ReOYVQd6vB

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 15, 2022

Minnesota family physician says we need to give trans children puberty blockers, HRT, and transition surgeries. She also encourages teens to seek healthcare without parents pic.twitter.com/ReOYVQd6vB

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 15, 2022

The ugly truth is that your child’s school or their pediatrician are not trustworthy anymore. These institutions and professions have been enslaved by the gender ideology cult. However, this does not mean that every teacher and pediatrician agrees with the idea. I’m sure most don’t. It takes only one thing for ideology to take root: the radicals must gain control of the institution, and intimidate everyone else to silence.

In far too many parts of this country, both the teaching and medical professions are at odds with your family and children. It could be that now the State aligns itself with them. If you don’t think this can happen in America, you need to familiarize yourself a) with what’s going on right now (don’t wait for the legacy media to tell you; it won’t), and with the history of eugenics in the early 20th century. All of the nation’s most powerful and progressive leaders supported eugenics back then. Big business, philanthropists, industrialists, even Mainline Protestant pastors. This was called “following science”. About twenty years ago, the scholar Christine Rosen published a fascinating history called Preaching Eugenics, about how mainstream religious leaders got caught up in promoting this stuff. From a review:

Indeed, eugenics became a key precept of the Social Gospel, the reformist Christian movement of that era. Religious leaders from all faiths adopted Galton’s science enthusiastically and incorporated it into their broad programs to eradicate poverty and end moral degeneracy.

By about 1910, ministers across the United States were pressing for purity reforms, promoting marriage counseling, and giving eugenic child-rearing advice. Other coercive methods were used. Walter Taylor Sumner, dean of Chicago’s Cathedral of Saints Peter and Paul and a disciple of the feminist social reformer Jane Addams, decreed in 1912 that he would marry no couple without a “certificate of health” from a reputable physician. Many states started to codify marriage certification as a matter of law, following the lead of churches and synagogues all over the country. Other social reformers, who were eugenically inclined, pushed for sterilization laws and segregation of “feebleminded”, into isolated colonies. These efforts were met with great success over many decades. The enthusiasm of religious leaders for race improvement culminated in the 1920’s with the establishment of the American Eugenics Society, an organization that explicitly compared its task with the “founding and development of Christianity.” As membership grew more than tenfold in its first decade, the society published a Eugenics Catechism extolling the mystical virtues of the human germplasm and downplaying the unpleasant aspects of negative plans like sterilization.

More:

[W]hat stands out from this history is the stark truth that eugenics in this country was a cause celebre not of fascists and hate-mongers but of a circle that understood itself to comprise the enlightened, the forward-thinking, the best people in the best churches. This was part of the progressive social program, which included women’s rights, birth control, wage reforms and temperance. And it was preached from pulpits across the country and exercised broad ecumenical and inter-religious appeal: when the American Eugenics Society sponsored biennial sermon contests in the late 1920’s, entries flooded in from Protestant preachers of various denominations as well as from Reform rabbis and Catholic priests.

Ironically enough, it was the opponents of eugenics, particularly religious fundamentalists, who were derided as ignorant, superstitious, and unscientific. The Roman Catholic Church was the most vocal advocate for individual liberty when eugenic legislation came to be. They cited the primacy of natural rights to procreate and marry over any state interest in encouraging racial equality.

Exactly! The fundies and Catholic hierarchy protected the weak and poor from progressives who wanted them to be “improved”. The world only saw the Nazis’ eugenics theories that it was in total disrepute. One last quote:

Subscribe Today

Get weekly emails in your inbox

In this light, it might be tempting to regard eugenics as a vaguely sinister pseudoscience, like phrenology or Lysenkoism. This would make a grave mistake in at least one aspect. Although the eugenics movement of the 1910’s and 20’s was replete with unsavory assumptions–not to mention bizarre and dubious theories–the reformers who embraced eugenics with such zeal had only a superficial interest in the supposed details of the science. Rosen pointed out that their goal was more pragmatic. They wanted to heal the social ills caused by hereditary disorders through physical and mental fitness.

And here we are, today with gender ideologists claiming that healthy minor girls must be castrated and their breasts removed in order to promote psychological and physical fitness.

Read More

Previous post Realism is the Future
Also, address abuse in community-based settings Next post Also, address abuse in community-based settings